TNRERA Cracks Down on Receipt Gaps in ₹1.35 Cr Corniche Flat Owner Case

A Matter of Receipts, Not Bricks: How Paperwork Sparked a Tribunal Verdict

Saranya Manoj
5 Min Read

In Case No. 147/2023, heard by the Tamil Nadu Real Estate Regulatory Authority (TNRERA), a flat buyer in Chennai’s luxury Corniche Project filed a complaint against Ramky Wavoo Developers Pvt. Ltd. (1st Respondent) and the Corniche Flat Owners Association (2nd Respondent).

The complaint highlighted confusion over maintenance responsibilities, double billing, and non-itemized receipts — all despite a hefty payment of ₹1.35 crore by the Complainant.


📌 Complainant’s Core Allegations

🔹 Property Purchase & Payment:

  • Allotted 5 flats through a possession certificate dated 31.12.2022
  • Paid a lump sum of ₹1,35,00,000, which included:
    • ₹5,00,000 – Corpus Fund
    • ₹3,22,176 – Advance Maintenance for 1 Year
    • ₹57,992 – GST
  • Took possession on 01.01.2023

🔹 Alleged Failures by the Builder:

  • Builder did not issue detailed receipts showing the corpus fund, maintenance, or GST breakup
  • Builder failed to transfer maintenance charges and corpus fund to the newly formed Association
  • From Sep to Dec 2023, the Complainant received maintenance invoices from the Association, forcing him to pay again for a service he had already paid for
  • Claimed total financial damage of ₹6,65,384 and described the builder’s act as “clever swindling”

🏢 1st Respondent’s (Ramky Wavoo Developers) Averments

🔸 Project History:

  • Project registered with TNRERA in 2018; Completion Certificate obtained on 13.01.2022
  • JDA signed with landowners (including Complainant) in 2012

🔸 Delay Was on Complainant’s Side:

  • Sent multiple reminders between May and Dec 2022 to take possession
  • Claimed that Complainant delayed clearing dues, hence possession was taken only in Jan 2023

🔸 Maintenance Timeline:

  • Maintenance responsibility ran from 15.08.2022 to 14.08.2023, communicated via email on 10.08.2022
  • Said Complainant entered midway into the maintenance cycle, like other buyers

🔸 Receipts & Funds:

  • Issued a single receipt for ₹1.35 crore — but the 1st respondent acknowledged that the receipt lacked specific breakdown
  • Stated that full corpus fund of ₹55 lakhs was transferred to the Association in:
    • ₹25,00,000 on 23.01.2024
    • ₹30,00,000 on 09.04.2024
  • Denied any violation of the RERA Act and called the complaint frivolous

🧾 2nd Respondent: Corniche Flat Owners Association – Issues and Involvement

🏘️ Role:

  • Officially formed on 04.09.2023
  • Became responsible for common area maintenance and collections

📩 Issues:

  • Issued invoices to the Complainant for Sep–Dec 2023 maintenance with GST, assuming non-payment
  • Did not verify whether builder had already collected and transferred funds
  • Failed to attend hearings and was declared ex-parte by TNRERA on 04.04.2024

🧃 Result:

  • While the Association was not legally at fault, their lack of communication and legal participation worsened confusion and buyer pressure

⚖️ Final Verdict by TNRERA

After careful analysis, the Authority delivered the following decision:

✅ Key Determinations:

QuestionVerdict
Was possession delayed?Yes, due to Complainant’s delay in clearing dues
Should builder pay for Sep–Dec 2023 maintenance?No, Association took over in Sept 2023
Were receipts inadequate?Yes, receipt lacked clarity, caused valid confusion

📜 Final Order:

“The 1st Respondent is directed to issue proper itemized receipts for the amounts received from the Complainant, including the corpus fund and advance maintenance charges along with GST — on or before 30.06.2025.”

Penalty or Compensation -The Authority did not impose penalties under Section 61 or grant financial compensation
Complaint Partly Allowed – The case was partially upheld—TNRERA agreed with the complainant on receipt failure, but not on liability for maintenance post-association formation as it was clearly indicated to the complainant that the maintenance charges paid to the builder were for the period from 15.08.2022 to 14.08.2023 in an email.


📊 Summary: Key Lessons from Case 147/2023

🧠 For Buyers:

  • Always demand clear, itemized receipts
  • Verify start dates for maintenance liability
  • Don’t assume that lump-sum payment = compliance

🏗 For Builders:

  • Maintain transparent accounting and communication
  • Use line-itemized invoicing to prevent disputes
  • Transfer funds to associations promptly and document it well

🏘 For Associations:

  • Don’t issue duplicate demands without confirming builder transfers
  • Participate in legal proceedings and maintain clear communication

Share This Article
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply