The Bombay High Court’s decision in Arrow Business Development Consultants Pvt. Ltd. vs Union Bank of India & Ors. (WP No. 11132 of 2025) delivers crucial clarity on a question that increasingly troubles banks, borrowers, and auction purchasers—

Whether a SARFAESI sale — especially a transfer of ownership of a secured asset — can be completed when an interim moratorium under Section 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) kicks in before the statutory sale certificate is fully issued.

📌 Case Snapshot

Court: Bombay High Court (Division Bench)
Citation: 2025:BHC-AS:54045-DB
Date of Judgment: 10 December 2025
Parties:

• Petitioner: Arrow Business Development Consultants Pvt. Ltd. — successful auction purchaser under SARFAESI
• Respondent No.1: Union Bank of India — secured creditor
• Respondent Nos.2 & 3: Insolvency Professional & co-owners/guarantors (personal insolvency under IBC)

Background of the Dispute

📜 Legal Issues Before the Court

1. Does issuing a SARFAESI sale notice (Rule 8(6)) or confirming the auction itself extinguish the borrower’s rights and transfer ownership?
2. If the interim moratorium under Section 96 IBC is in force before the sale certificate is fully issued:
   • Can the Bank complete the SARFAESI sale by accepting final payments and issuing the sale certificate?
   • Can the auction purchaser claim ownership and seek possession?

Understanding IBC (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code)

IBC (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code) is a law that protects people or companies who cannot repay loans.

Once someone files an insolvency application:

• The law pauses all recovery actions
• No one can sell, transfer, or take over the person’s assets
• This pause is called a moratorium

Think of it as a legal ‘pause button’.

What the Bombay High Court Held

The Court drew a clear legal line:

• Winning a bank auction does not mean ownership unless the full payment is made and the sale certificate is issued.
• Even if the borrower loses the right to redeem the property, ownership continues until the sale is legally completed.
• If an IBC moratorium starts before the sale certificate is issued, the bank must stop the sale process.
• Because the sale was incomplete, the auction buyer did not become the legal owner and could not get possession.

Why This Judgment Is Important

This ruling settles an important misconception in recovery law:

• SARFAESI sales are not “complete” merely because an auction is held.
• Timing of the IBC moratorium is decisive.
• IBC cannot undo a completed sale—but it can block an incomplete one.

For banks and bidders, the message is blunt:

Delay in completing SARFAESI formalities can be fatal.

Implications for Property Buyers , Banks & Borrowers

• Auction purchasers must ensure full payment and immediate issuance of the sale certificate.
• Banks must act swiftly post-auction to avoid insolvency-triggered roadblocks.
• Borrowers can still invoke IBC protection if the sale is legally incomplete.

This judgment strengthens IBC’s role as a protective shield, not a retroactive weapon.

Conclusion

The Arrow Business Development Consultants case reinforces a crucial legal principle:
IBC moratorium prevails over SARFAESI enforcement if ownership has not legally transferred.

In property auctions and secured asset sales, procedural timing is everything—and overlooking it can collapse even a successful auction.