<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Maharashtra RERA &#8211; Chennai&#039;s Verified.RealEstate Community</title>
	<atom:link href="https://community.verified.realestate/article/tag/maharashtra-rera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://community.verified.realestate</link>
	<description>Chennai Real Estate Insights &#38; Tips - Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2026 15:53:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>TNRERA Penalises Builder for Collecting Over 10% Before Agreement Registration</title>
		<link>https://community.verified.realestate/article/tnrera-penalises-builder-for-collecting-over-10-before-agreement-registration/</link>
					<comments>https://community.verified.realestate/article/tnrera-penalises-builder-for-collecting-over-10-before-agreement-registration/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saranya Manoj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2026 15:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal and Regulatory Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RERA updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advance Payment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chennai Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerald Haven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homebuyer rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maharashtra RERA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RERA Section 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sale Agreement Registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TNRERA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://community.verified.realestate/?p=21303</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Before paying beyond 10%, check that your agreement is registered]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A ₹50,000 penalty against Emerald Haven Development Limited in Chennai highlights a basic homebuyer safeguard: </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">📌<strong>a builder cannot collect more than 10% of a property’s cost as an advance or application fee before entering into a written agreement for sale and registering it</strong>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A recent Maharashtra ruling involving a ₹10 lakh penalty reinforces why buyers should check agreement registration before making substantial payments.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Emerald Haven collected nearly 60% before registration</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In its 13 October 2026 order concerning TVS Emerald Luxor, TNRERA examined payments of <strong>₹1,72,93,689 against a total consideration of ₹2,88,22,815—approximately 60%.</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The sale and construction agreements dated 17 July 2025 remained unregistered. TNRERA imposed a ₹50,000 penalty for violating Section 13 of the RERA Act. <strong>The penalty is payable to TNRERA, not to the buyers.</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The authority directed registration of the agreements and conveyance of the undivided land share within 30 days. Apartment handover remained linked to the promised delivery date.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The buyers alleged that TVS Emerald Luxor was advertised as being in the <strong>“heart of Anna Nagar,” with PIN code 600040</strong>, while its RERA records identified the location as <strong>Padi, with PIN code 600050</strong>. They argued that this influenced their purchase decision and led them to pay an Anna Nagar premium.<br>The developer denied deliberate misrepresentation. It maintained that the project was situated in <strong>Anna Nagar West Extension</strong> and that the different PIN code in the registration records was a clerical error.<br><mark style="background-color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)" class="has-inline-color has-luminous-vivid-orange-color"><a href="https://community.verified.realestate/article/builder-says-anna-nagar-rera-says-padi-tnrera-orders-address-correction/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">TNRERA had earlier restricted advertising pending correction of the address details.</a></mark> In its October order, the authority recorded that the PIN code<strong> had been corrected to</strong> <strong>600040</strong>, found no violation of <strong>Section 12—which concerns false or misleading advertisements—and lifted the interim restriction</strong>. The developer was still required to display the correct postal and site addresses in its advertisements.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Maharashtra tribunal orders refund and ₹10 lakh penalty</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In <strong>Manojkumar Singh v. Era Realtors Pvt. Ltd.</strong>, the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal examined a similar failure to execute and register an agreement for sale.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The buyer had paid approximately ₹1.008 crore against a flat price of ₹2.77 crore. The builder continued demanding instalments and eventually cancelled the allotment for non-payment.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On <strong>7 September 2026</strong>, the tribunal held the cancellation unlawful in those circumstances. It ordered a refund of approximately <strong>₹80.77 lakh</strong>, after accounting for an earlier ₹20 lakh refund, along with interest. It also imposed a <strong>₹10 lakh penalty</strong> and awarded <strong>₹50,000 in costs</strong> to the buyer.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">What does RERA’s 10% rule mean?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Section 13 requires the promoter to enter into a written agreement for sale and register it before accepting more than 10% of the apartment, plot or building cost as an advance or application fee.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For an apartment costing <strong>₹80 lakh, the threshold is ₹8 lakh</strong>. Registration must happen before the promoter accepts payments beyond that threshold.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is an existing legal requirement. The two decisions illustrate its enforcement.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">A receipt, signed agreement and registered agreement serve different purposes</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Signing an agreement alone is not enough:</strong> Section 13 requires its registration before the promoter accepts more than 10% of the property’s cost as advance payment.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><thead><tr><th>Document</th><th>What it establishes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Booking or payment receipt</strong></td><td>Records the payment received; it does not replace a registered agreement for sale.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Signed agreement</strong></td><td>Records the agreed terms, but signatures alone do not establish registration.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Registered agreement for sale</strong></td><td>Formally records the agreement through registration. Buyers should check its registration particulars and retain a copy.</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An agreement for sale also differs from the final conveyance deed that transfers ownership.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Asked to Pay 80% Before Registration?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Emerald Haven case highlights why buyers should question large advance demands before their sale agreement is registered. Read our guide on <mark style="background-color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)" class="has-inline-color has-luminous-vivid-orange-color"><a href="https://community.verified.realestate/article/developers-demanding-80-payment-before-registration-is-it-legal-under-rera/" data-type="link" data-id="https://community.verified.realestate/article/developers-demanding-80-payment-before-registration-is-it-legal-under-rera/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">developers demanding 80% payment before registration</a> </mark>to understand the payment rules and checks to make before releasing further instalments.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">What buyers should check before paying more</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Check the total amount already paid against the property cost. Confirm that the agreement for sale is signed and registered before payments cross 10%.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Before paying a substantial advance, get your sale agreement and payment terms reviewed through Verified.RealEstate’s <a href="https://verified.realestate/services/legal-opinion"><mark style="background-color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)" class="has-inline-color has-luminous-vivid-orange-color">legal services</mark></a>. This can help identify missing registration steps and clauses that need clarification before you commit more money.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Review the payment schedule, possession date and default-interest terms. Keep copies of the agreement, receipts and correspondence.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Project registration with RERA and registration of your purchase agreement are separate checks. Completing one does not complete the other.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://community.verified.realestate/article/tnrera-penalises-builder-for-collecting-over-10-before-agreement-registration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
