The proposed ₹1,200-crore complex was planned across approximately 25.55 acres, with around 20 lakh sq. ft. of built-up space. The government said the project was necessary because of space limitations at the existing Secretariat in Fort St. George.

PIL and Fishermen’s Protest Against the Proposal

Advocate R.S. Tamilvendan filed a public interest litigation before the Madras High Court seeking directions to abandon the Pattinapakkam Secretariat proposal. The petitioner argued that using the Tamil Nadu Housing Board land for the complex could affect housing intended for economically weaker residents, disrupt the welfare and livelihoods of fishing communities and worsen traffic congestion. The petition also questioned the need to spend ₹1,200 crore when the existing Secretariat at Fort St. George could reportedly be renovated and continued.

Meanwhile, more than 1,000 fishermen and residents representing over ten fishing villages gathered at Marina Beach to oppose the proposal. They claimed that the project could affect traditional fishing activities, coastal access and the livelihoods of nearly 1,500 fishing families. The representatives demanded that the government withdraw the proposal and warned that they would organise wider protests if their concerns were not addressed.

Has an Alternative Location Been Found?

As of September 21, 2026, no exact alternative site has been officially confirmed. Reports indicate that the government has begun examining possible locations along Chennai’s East Coast Road—or ECR. A final decision is expected only after further consultations.

Therefore, it would be inaccurate to say that the Pattinapakkam announcement has already been formally withdrawn. The correct position is that the location is under reconsideration, while alternative ECR sites are being explored.